Are Filmed Pat Downs More Circumspect?

Discussion in 'Aviation Passenger Security in the USA' started by Elizabeth Conley, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. Elizabeth Conley

    Elizabeth Conley Original Member

    Ashley Jessica, who holds an M.A. in Clinical Psychology and is currently studying for her P.H.D. in the same, has concluded that filmed pat-downs are significantly more circumspect than those which are not filmed.

    In particular, the TSA thug openly attempted to condition Ms. Jessica to passively tolerate the thug's overt sexual assault in the following manner: The thug pawed Ms. Jessica's privates repeatedly, and insisted that she would repeatedly paw Ms. Jessica's privates until Ms. Jessica stopped flinching under the assault.

    While Infowars has limited credibility to me, Ms. Jessica seems to be on to something.
  2. nachtnebel

    nachtnebel Original Member

    I hope every one of these clerks who abuse people like this get the same experience someday, preferably in prison. It's disgusting and they know it; that's why they back off when they're being filmed. If it was not wrong, why change when filmed?

    Nobody should have this power to touch where ever they want however hard they want without recourse. It is sick and it is sick starting with the top man, Pistole. Every bad experience, every humilation, every molestation that has been performed is on him. He should know better. As a supposed christian, he should know better.
    Elizabeth Conley and barbell like this.

Share This Page