Discussion in 'What's On Your Mind?' started by DeafBlonde, Oct 16, 2011.
Yes, I agree. Your perspective is a funny thing indeed.
Not to mention a red herring completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Nice attempt at a smoke screen...not calling you a liar but cite your source of said info.
Wow, 34,598. About 10 times the death toll of 9/11.
Why is this sorry excuse for a country so worried about aviation security again?
Now, do you have anything relevant to the topic at hand?
Our talented sub-thread relocation specialists have "relevanciated" (I'm not a TSO, but I'm pretty sure that word is in their vocabulary) this ascendant irrelevancy.
The root problem, Ron, is that you yourself are not presenting any facts. Just throwing out a link does not an argument nor discussion make.
You could post links to the flat earth groups and with your rationalization claim them as 'proof' of the earth being flat, when in fact they are anything but proof. Intentional ignorance? No, not swallowing the lies, deceptions, and half-truths spewed out of your agency in a feeble attempt at getting respect and compliance from the traveling public shows that we're on to what your agency is attempting to pull off. Collectively, your agency employes the dregs of humanity while maintaining the lie that TSA actually accomplishes their mission (GAO reports glaringly point that out).
Sure then again it only took me about 30 secs to find the NVSR data, as well as NHTSA fatality data.
He's also fond of linking to pages that contain a lot of information completely irrelevant the to question at hand, then telling people they didn't read it when they point out that there's no relevant information in it.
Red herrings aren't citations, evidence, or proof. The links you post are the equivalent of saying "cheese is made from milk" when someone asks you for directions to the grocery store.
There has to be relevant information in what you link in order for any of what you're saying here to apply.
No, what is sad is the untreatable condition where some poor illiterates have an irrational compulsion to insert apostrophes where they don't belong. But keep on doing it. It provides irrefutable proof of the education level of our blue-gloved gropers.
There is an obvious reading comprehension problem at play here. It is a serious lack of ability to read critically, and is evident in this very thread.
Anyone who would quote the 10th Amendment as justification for federal-level drug enforcement is seriously deranged. There is simply no other explanation.
Anyone who would publicly claim to work for the TSA, whether or not they actually do, is seriously deranged.
Being both deranged and apostrophically challenged at the same time must be a terrible thing.
Separate names with a comma.