Discussion in 'Aviation Passenger Security in the USA' started by Elizabeth Conley, Dec 8, 2011.
Blackburn is a Congressional rep, not a state rep.
I know that, and if you'll take the time to read my post in is entirely, you will see that was distinguishing between the two events.
God, there are a lot of TSA apologist idiots posting over there.
Ah, sorry. The only Tennessee thing I know about is Marsha Blackburn, Congressional rep from Tennessee. I didn't realize there was another action, a state action, that was symbolic.
I think you are right -- the first report I read painted it as a Tennessee move, targeting uniforms. Later rerorts credit it to House Republicans targeting officer status.
But it's all the same bill, with a number of sponsers.
I am going to merge the three threads. If I'm wrong, I guess I'll get to sort out the posts back into multiple threads.
Threads are merged. I kept Elizabeth's original/earliest title, slightly edited to avoid any ambiguity.
You can't save idiots from themselves.
If our constitutional rights to privacy are being violated by the TSA, for example, don’t blame the officers. Blame those in Congress who order the TSA to carry out those functions.
So he's a fan of the 'I was just following orders' type of defense? Sorry, I blame both Congress and the screeners who are violating our rights.
And he's just flat out wrong. I don't think there are any congress people ordering the TSA to strip search little old ladies. We have Pistole (who is not a member of congress, last time I checked) to thank for that.
I have no problem whatsoever with trying to rationalize and modernize the policies of the TSA.
He's essentially fine with whatever procedures or tactics the TSA decides to use or employ. I have no idea what 'modernize' means in this context.
This has got to be one of the most ill-informed opinion pieces I've read in a long time.
Joe Walsh for President!
Rush Limbaugh use to refer to AJC as the Atlanta Urinal & Constipation. Perhaps there was a reason for this.
I hope you left a comment over there to that effect. I sure did.
Eeek! No thanks.
This news has really made my day!
Betcha' a Kippie bag full of minis that the TSA "Honor Guard" quietly goes away, since marching around in dress slacks and a blazer just doesn't have the visual propaganda effect.
$12 million for their faux-police uniforms instituted in 2008. Pocket change!
HA! I've never heard that before! Oh no, I just laughed at something Rush Limbaugh said -- my head is going to explode!
Ur, um, not yet, but I will......
Transcript in case of overzealous site moderation:
Of course it's the UNION that's defending its workers as poor, unfairly maligned creatures. Probably verbiage supplied on cue as part of their deal:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ho...lying-tactics-aimed-at-tsa-workers-2011-12-09 PR reprinted in MarketWatch no less.
Most people are probably unaware of the honor guards and other instances of posing as law enforcement. Short and sweet comments elsewhere are needed:
I thanked my Congresswoman for being a co-sponsor. Maybe I can expand on that thank you as a local Letter to the Editor.
Now a story at CNN. Union President:
HR 3608 needs our support. It would be terrible to have this used as an excuse for wasting LE training on these folks.
Here's the hooey with Disqus comment. This PR piece is being reprinted all over. Fire at will. At least it opens the way for Op-Eds, Letters, etc in response as well as blog comments.
My congressman, Leonard Lance, as expected is not a co-sponsor of the bill. Why am I not surprised? I e-mailed him. Can hardly wait for is response.
Look at the bottom of this page:
There's a place to report mistakes or inaccuracies. I suggest we all use it; I did.
Separate names with a comma.