TSA's Behavior Detection Officer : Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Discussion in 'Aviation Passenger Security in the USA' started by Lisa Simeone, Jan 5, 2012.

  1. Lisa Simeone

    Lisa Simeone Original Member

    TSA's Behavior Detection Officer : Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
    by Bill Singer, at Forbes
    Stroll on over and leave a comment. I did.
     
  2. Mike

    Mike Founding Member Coach

    "non-intrusive"? The *ssh*l* that got in my face at STL & tried to pick a fight was "non-intrusive"?

    Not to mention the one at BUF that just got sent off to the hoosgow for helping drug dealers evade security to carry cash through the airports.
     
  3. TravelnMedic

    TravelnMedic Original Member

    the problems is they stick out like puss filled thumbs. Each and everytime they start flapping there gums i look at them in disgust and say "Out Out damn spot... go play your <insert descriptive shocker> mind games on someone else."
     
  4. Lisa Simeone

    Lisa Simeone Original Member

    But Singer falls flat here:
     
    Caradoc likes this.
  5. Fisher1949

    Fisher1949 Original Member Coach

  6. FaustsAccountant

    FaustsAccountant Original Member

    Or how about my facial expression (the redness and watery eyes or whatever) are as such because someone just walked by me wearing five and half bottles of sharp perfume?

    Or the expression I have is because I just annoyance because I came out of the elevator where some kid hit every single button and their parents let them?

    Or a multitude of things that has nothing to do with compromising safety of others traveling. Even license and trained psychologists and their likes aren't always 100% right. Some half wit yahoo with minimal cursory cliff noted training working hours on end staring at countless thousands of different people can make an accurate assessment in a few moment? I got a bridge to sell you.
     
    Lisa Simeone likes this.
  7. Lisa Simeone

    Lisa Simeone Original Member

    Again, as with everything else in this abusive agency, this is Pistole's doing. This is Pistole's fault. The man is a menace.
     
  8. Caradoc

    Caradoc Original Member

    Neither Pistole's boss, nor her boss, have done anything to rein him in.

    Nor have the complicit hordes of blue-shirted thugs refused to carry out the stupidity.

    There's plenty of blame to go around - but it all comes down to having a bunch of undereducated dingleberries running around pretending to be concerned with "security" when their sole concerns are exerting authority, groping people, and stealing stuff.
     
  9. Sunny Goth

    Sunny Goth Original Member Coach

    That pretty much sums it up.

    sigh
     
  10. N965VJ

    N965VJ Original Member

    I really hate that phrase. :rolleyes: It indicates no critical thinking has been done by the person making that statement.
     
    Lisa Simeone likes this.
  11. Sky Dancer

    Sky Dancer Original Member

    I haven't yet had the opportunity to speak to one of these clowns. When the time comes, I'll be pleasant and will tell them what airport I'm flying to, and maybe a small tidbit of what I do for a living. If it goes farther, That's the time that *I* want to see some ID. If it's not an LEO or a person with a Human Behavioral Degree, the conversation is over.
     
  12. Mike

    Mike Founding Member Coach

    If it's a LEO, the conversation should still be over.
     
    Lisa Simeone likes this.
  13. Frank

    Frank Original Member

    Yup. No one is required to answer the inquiries of law enforcement, even if you are under arrest. The 5th Amendment is still in force, NDAA notwithstanding.
     

Share This Page